Are cyclists all part of the same club?

Cyclists run red lights. They also blow through crosswalks, don’t wear helmets, and ride the wrong way down one-way streets. They also Come Out of Nowhere and they Get In The Way of normal people. Also, they wear Spandex.

I know this because, when all of we cyclists in the world gather together at our monthly meeting, we all renew our pledge to behave the exact same way. And to wear Spandex. So say we all.

Social psychologists call it the “outgroup homogeneity bias.” People who are like you are more varied and behave according to the situation; people who are different from you are all alike and behave according to their disposition. When a fellow driver swerves in front of you, it’s probably because he was avoiding a road hazard. When a weirdo cyclist swerves in front of you, it’s because he’s a weirdo.

Most cyclists also walk and drive a fair amount, so they’re less susceptible to this cognitive bias.

But what about drivers? Are they all part of the same club?

Turns out many of them are. It’s called the American Automobile Association, and for over a century it had been lobbying against bike paths, bike-friendly traffic rules, and what it regards as “excessive” enforcement of the law.

Oh, and they also lie about Massachusetts bicycle laws, informing their members that “[b]icycles should stay to the right along the curb” and the sublimely absurd advice for cyclists to “walk a bike across an intersection rather than riding.”

AAA has 51 million members. Chances are when you’re dealing with a cop, a judge, a reporter, or anyone else whose job it is to formulate an unbiased perception of you, that person is a member of this club.

Which reminds me, I really ought to renew my Better World membership.

– Reverend E

Posted in conjectures and refutations | Leave a comment

First day out

So today was my first day on the bike after my horrible crash two months ago. I just tooled around my neighborhood, riding up to my local bicycle shop and purchasing a blazingly bright front light, to add to my two already bright blinky lights.

My bones hurt, but it still felt great to be back in the saddle after all this time.

As I mentioned in my previous post, I’m no longer using the bike lanes in Cambridge, especially not on Mass. Ave., because the civil authorities have ruled that if I collide with a jaywalker in the bike lane, it’s nobody’s fault but my own.

So instead I went slow, and took the lane, as is my right under Massachusetts law.

On my way back home, just as I was passing the very spot where I crashed, a cab behind me laid on his horn. He then pulled into the bike lane beside me, leaned out his window, and threatened to run me over if I didn’t get out of his way.

That’s assault. In my pre-crash life, I might have called the police. But these days I don’t believe in the police, so I just told him to be fruitful and multiply, but not in those exact words.

That was after about two minutes of riding on Mass. Ave. On Monday, I plan on taking the lane on Mass. Ave. for a long stretch on my way to and from work. This is going to get interesting.

– Reverend E

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why I’m taking the lane

One night just over two months ago, I was riding in the bike lane on Mass Ave. in Cambridge, when a pedestrian stepped out from between two cars in front of me. We collided, and I went into the back of a parked truck, breaking a few bones. He was hurt, too, but not nearly as badly. The jaywalker and his companions blamed me for the collision. The police did not cite him.

The pain was excruciating. I am fortunate in that I have good health insurance, but my medical bills, bike repair costs, and lost wages added up to over a thousand dollars.

I sued the guy in small claims court, charging that he failed to exercise reasonable caution when entering the road. (As for me, I had two blinky lights on the front, I was wearing a white shirt, and I was going well below the speed limit).  During the trial last week, I learned that the police officer on the scene told the jaywalker that he was not responsible for the collision. The defendant also said that the officer promised to “shred” the incident report.

The other day, I received notice of the judgment. The clerk-magistrate, George L. Shea, ruled in favor of the defendant, without explanation. The notice said that I should “see the instructions on the back of this form to see what options are available to you.”

The back of the form was blank.

I learned two things from this incident:

1) The police and the courts are irredeemably biased against cyclists. Even if you obey all the rules of the road – as I always do – cyclists are not guaranteed equal protection under the law.

2) The bike lanes in Cambridge aren’t safe.

So now I’m blogging my recovery. My bones still ache, but I’m feeling a little stronger each day. Today, I’m back on my bike for the first time after the crash. I’ll be taking it slow for the first few weeks. And I’ll be taking the lane.

– Reverend E

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment